Basic Course in Pediatric Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation – Niakoro

Basic Course in Pediatric Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation

Basic Course in Pediatric Heart Failure and Heart Transplantation

Course Content

Total learning: 67 lessons / 6 quizzes Time: 8 hours

Risk of infection after transplantation

Temporal relationship between infectious etiology and time after transplantation:

  • The risk for bacterial and fungal infection is greatest in the first four weeks related with higher doses of immunosuppressive treatment, and decreases after three months.
  • The risk for CMV infection peaks after the discontinuation of antiviral prophylaxis in at-risk patients.
  • Viral infections (non CMV) are acquired and develops more than 6 months after surgery.

CMV PROPHYLAXIS AND POST TRANSPLANT MONITORING FOR CMV VIREMIA

  • Check recipient CMV IgG pre- transplan; note donor CMV IgG status; note any CMV positive blood products given to donor or recipient; assume donor CMV IgG seropositive if hemodiluted sample; and determine highest risk category. If recipient or donor age <18 months, then serologies likely reflect maternal serologies; 3 months prophylaxis will be considered sufficient with PCR testing post discontinuation.
  • CMV prophylaxis is implemented universally for first 3 months post heart transplant due to issues with determining minimal risk, prevalence of disease, and level of immune suppression during that time period.

Risk of CMV

Disease

Transplant Post-transplant

CMV prophylaxis

Monitoring for CMV

Rejection CMV

prophylaxis

High D+/R- Ganciclovir IV 5mg/kg twice daily through induction

(2 weeks)

 

 

 

 

Valganciclovir Q24h VO

Duration 3months min (max 6). If CMV PCR is positive after discontinuing, then treat followed by continuation of prophylaxis for minimum of 12 months post-transplant

Check CMV PCR

-on the day of HTx

-weekly x 4 weeks

-q2 weeks until 3 months’ post Tx

-q monthly until 6 months’ post Tx

-q3 monthly until one-year post Tx

-q6 monthly thereafter

-whenever clinically indicated

Quantitative PCR for CMV when positive CMV PCR

CMV prophylaxis x 1 month

 

Check CMV PCR at time of rejection

Intermediate D+/R+

D-/R+

Ganciclovir IV 5mg/kg twice daily through induction

(2 weeks)

Valganciclovir Q24h VO

Duration 1-3 months

Same as above CMV prophylaxis x 1 month

 

Check CMV PCR at time of rejection

Minimal* D-/R-

 

*Risk is only minimal for CMV if D-/R- from a sample that is not hemodiluted and when no CMV positive blood products have been given

Ganciclovir IV 5mg/kg twice daily through induction

(2 weeks)

 

NO

 

Monitoring for clinical symptoms

 

Same as above CMV prophylaxis x 1 month

 

Check CMV PCR at time of rejection

CMV: Drugs, doses for prophylaxis and treatment, and renal adjustments: 

Ganciclovir IV 5 mg/kg – Q 24h for prophylaxis; Q 12h for treatment

 

For ClCr 50-70 ml/min/1.73m2, give 2.5 mg/kg/dose Q 12h For ClCr 25-50 ml/min/1.73m2, give 2.5 mg/kg/dose Q 24h For ClCr < 25 ml/min/1.73m2, give 1.25 mg/kg/dose Q 24h

Valganciclovir

 

 

 

4m – 16 y:

7x BSA x CrCl (max 900mg / dose)

 

CrCl: creatinine clearance (mL/min/1.732)

 

Schwartz CrCl:                     0,413 x Height (cm) /                                 Serum Creatinine (mg/dL)

Formulations: 450 mg tablet; 50 mg/mL solution; 900 mg tablet

 

Dosing: See renal adjustment below for weight-based dosing in renal insufficiency*

Weight < 25 kg: 15-18 mg/kg/dose

Weight 25-45 kg: 450 mg per dose

Weight > 45 kg: 900 mg per dose

(once daily for prophylaxis, BID dosing for treatment)]

 

*For ClCr 40-59 ml/min/1.73m2, administer half of above dose daily

For ClCr 25-39 ml/min/1.73m2, administer half of above dose every other day

For ClCr 10-24 ml/min/1.73m2, administer half of above dose twice a week For patients on dialysis, use ganciclovir

* Foscarnet and cidofovir are alternative antivirals with activity against CMV. If you need to use either, consult with the infectious disease specialist regarding indication and the pharmacist regarding the best dosing regimen as they are both more complicated to administer and both have high prevalence of adverse effects including renal and/or hepatic toxicity. Adapted of Razonable et al. American Journal of Transplantation 2013; 13: 93–106

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *